Skip to content
Log inBook a demo
Healthcare

Segregation of duties, without a second team.

A 430-person healthcare provider in Ghent had to satisfy an auditor's segregation-of-duties finding with five people in finance.Nobody was hired.

The company

Company size
430 people, 5 of them in finance
Location
Ghent, Belgium
Systems replaced
A shared bank login, an expense tool and a manual approval log
Time to value
6 weeks to the finding closed
Two colleagues reviewing a document together in a meeting room

1 → 0

Shared credentials

6 weeks

Finding to closed

5

People in finance

Alderway runs residential care homes across Flanders. Four hundred and thirty people, five of them in finance, and an external auditor who had raised the same finding two years running.

The situation

The finding was segregation of duties, and it was correct. On a team of five, the person who set up a supplier was frequently the person who paid it, not out of carelessness but out of arithmetic — somebody was on leave, somebody else was covering two sites, and the payment had to go out on Thursday.

  • A shared bank login, because individual credentials had not been practical.
  • An expense tool where the administrator was also an ordinary claimant.
  • A manual approval log, completed after the fact, from memory.

The standard answer to this finding is to hire. Alderway had costed it: two roles, neither of which would be busy, in a sector where every euro of overhead is a euro not spent on care. The board had declined twice and the finding had stayed open twice.

The change

The controls moved into the rules. Initiating a payment, approving it and releasing it are three distinct permissions, and no person holds a combination that lets them complete a payment alone — including the finance director, which was the detail that satisfied the auditor.

The part that made it workable on a team of five is that the rules cover absence. If the ordinary approver is away, the fallback is defined in advance rather than improvised, so nobody has to choose between the control and the Thursday deadline.

Every previous answer to this finding started with hiring somebody. The answer was to write down what we already meant and let the system hold us to it.

Iris Bakker · Finance Director, Alderway

The outcome

The finding closed six weeks after the project started, and it has not been raised since.

There are no shared credentials. Every payment carries two named people, and the finance team is still five. The auditor’s note the following year records the control as effective, which is a sentence Alderway had been trying to get written for three years.

What they use

The screen Alderway opens first.

The Finly overview screen: cash position €4.28M, net burn €612K and 19 months of runway, a twelve-week spend chart split between cards, bill pay and reimbursements, and a queue of three transactions needing a human.

Two names on every payment, from five people.

Initiator and approver are enforced by the rules rather than by who is at their desk.With five people that used to be impossible on a busy week;it now resolves itself.

Get started

Open an account today. Change plan any month.

Issue your first card the same day.Or let us run your own last month through a sandbox first, so you see the close before you commit to anything.